Pl
Keogh
Df
Commissioner
Keogh (21 Dealer)
o
Keogh was employed at the Dunes
Hotel in Las Vegas.
o
He was a 21 dealer.
o
He made his money from wages and
toke tips.
o
The commissioner of the IRSA assert
that Keoghs had underreported his wages from 1969 71.
Commissions Statistical Analysis
o
Based on Whitlockss diary.
Problems with the diary.
o
Did not cover the entire period.
o
Was not always a 21 dealer. Craps
dealers make more money and do not share tokes.
o
Commissioner did not consult with
gaming authority.
o
Whitmore has a poor reputation for
honesty and truthfulness.
Principal evidence
o
Photocopy of Whitlocks diary
o
Testimony from X-wife Barbara.
o
Admitted under 803(6). |
Court
Tax court did not abuse its discretion
in admitting the diary.
Keoghs Arg - Rule 803(6) does not apply.
o
The diary because it was not a
business record.
o
The diary was Whitlock's personal
record, not a record of the business enterprise involved, the
Dunes.
Court
Show indication of his own business activity.
o
But Whitlock's diary, even though
personal to him, shows every indication of being kept "in the
course of" his own "business activity," "occupation, and
calling."
o
Personal records kept for business
reasons may be able to qualify.
Housekeeper example
o
A housekeeper's records kept neatly
and accurately for purposes of balancing bank statements,
keeping strict budgets and preparing income tax returns could
qualify under the statute."
Court
Person business records requirements
o
The reliability usually found in
records kept by business concerns may be established in personal
business records if they are
o
Systematically checked and
o
Regularly and continually
maintained.
Court
X-Wife saw Whitlock update his diary
o
Systematically, regularly and
continuously.
Keoghs Cites 803(6) only applies to commercial business
records.
o
Rule 803(6) applies only to
commercial business records.
o
Kept by those under a business duty
to do so that arose in the commercial context.
Court
- of timeliness and regularity of entries that are present here
o
More to the point is Sabatino v.
Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs,
o
A man has a direct financial
interest in keeping accurate accounts in his personal business.
o
The cases indicate that private
records, if kept regularly and if incidental to some personal
business pursuit, are competent evidence.
o
It made no difference whether the
check account was used for any specific business.
Keoghs Arg - dispute the general trustworthiness of the diary
entries.
o
Palmer v. Hoffman,
o
Alleging that Whitlock's motives in
preparing the diary were never explained.
Court
- Palmer v. Hoffman is not in point
o
Because there is no evidence that
Whitlock's motives in making the entries were suspect.
o
The diary contained his own personal
financial records.
o
The reliability of the tip entries
is corroborated by Dunes' payroll records
o
Rule 803(6) is NOT made inapplicable
by the fact that Mikle, not Whitlock, testified to lay the
foundation for the diary.
Keoghs Custodian testimony is required.
o
The Keoghs contend that the
testimony of Whitlock as custodian of the diary was required.
o
Only he could speak to his reliance
on the records.
Court
- There is no reason to believe that Whitlock did not rely on
his personal financial diary
o
We do not find that the tax court
abused its discretion in admitting it without Whitlock's
personal testimony. |